Power Your Software Testing with AI Agents and Cloud

The Native AI-Agentic Cloud Platform to Supercharge Quality Engineering. Test Intelligently and Ship Faster.

AutomationTutorial

PHP Testing Frameworks: 11 Tools for Unit, BDD and E2E Tests

A comparison of PHP testing frameworks for unit, BDD, acceptance, browser, mocking, and mutation testing, with versions checked on Packagist and every example run on PHP 8.4.

Last Updated on:

PHP testing frameworks split into four jobs: unit tests, BDD and acceptance tests, browser tests, and tools that check how strong the tests are. Older roundups still list frameworks that stopped shipping releases years ago, so each tool below comes with its latest release and the PHP version it needs.

In JetBrains' State of PHP 2025 survey of 1,720 PHP developers, PHPUnit (50%) remains the standard, Pest adoption grew four percentage points to 17%, PHPStan led code quality tools at 36%, and 32% of developers still don't write tests at all.

Every code block below ran on PHP 8.4.26 on Windows 11, and the browser tests also ran on Chrome, Firefox, and Safari on TestMu AI's Selenium grid.

PHP Testing Frameworks at a Glance

PHPUnit is the standard PHP testing framework, used by 50% of PHP developers in JetBrains' 2025 survey, and Pest, at 17% and growing, is the main alternative built on top of it. Pick one for unit tests, then add tools by layer for acceptance, browser, mocking, and mutation testing.

Unit Testing

  • Best for standard unit testing: PHPUnit is the class-based framework that most PHP testing tools build on. PHPUnit 13 requires PHP 8.4 and reads test metadata only from PHP 8 attributes such as #[DataProvider].
  • Best for readable unit tests: Pest runs on PHPUnit with function-based it() and expect() tests. Pest 5 requires PHP 8.4, and its browser plugin runs browser tests through Playwright.

BDD and Acceptance Testing

  • Best for full-stack test suites: Codeception covers unit, functional, acceptance, and API tests in one framework, written as Cest classes in which an $I actor performs readable steps such as fillField() and see().
  • Best for Gherkin acceptance tests: Behat maps Given/When/Then scenarios written in Gherkin to PHP methods. Behat 4.0, released in September 2026, supports PHP 8.2 to 8.5.
  • Best for spec-first class design: PHPSpec describes the behavior of an object before the code exists, then drives you to write just enough code to meet that spec.
  • Best for describe-it specs: Kahlan uses RSpec-style describe() and it() blocks and can stub or monkey patch code without installing a PECL extension.

Browser Testing

  • Best for Laravel browser tests: Laravel Dusk drives Chrome through a standalone ChromeDriver, so it needs no JDK or Selenium install, and it can switch to any Selenium-compatible server.
  • Best for browser tests outside Laravel: Symfony Panther is a standalone library that drives real Chrome and Firefox over the W3C WebDriver protocol, in Symfony apps and other PHP projects alike.
  • Best for Selenium from plain PHP: php-webdriver is the PHP binding for Selenium WebDriver, works with Selenium 2.x to 4.x, and is the library Laravel Dusk and Codeception's WebDriver module build on.
  • Best for cloud browser testing: TestMu AI runs PHP browser suites, from plain php-webdriver tests to Laravel Dusk, in parallel across 3,000+ browser and OS combinations once they point at its cloud hub.

Mocking and Mutation Testing

  • Best for isolating dependencies: Mockery replaces databases, API clients, or payment gateways with test doubles and works with PHPUnit, PHPSpec, or any other test framework.
  • Best for measuring test strength: Infection mutates your code, reruns the tests against each mutant, and reports the share of mutants caught as the Mutation Score Indicator (MSI).

What Is PHP Testing?

PHP testing is the practice of verifying PHP code with automated tests that run on demand or in CI, instead of clicking through the application after every change. The tools install per project as Composer dev dependencies, so they never ship to production.

A PHP test suite usually covers these layers, and the frameworks below map onto them:

  • Unit tests - check one function or class in isolation, usually with PHPUnit or Pest. This primer on unit testing covers the concepts the PHP tools implement.
  • Functional and integration tests - check components working together, such as a controller, its service, and the database, often through framework helpers or Codeception's framework modules.
  • Acceptance and browser tests - drive the real UI the way a user would, with Laravel Dusk, Symfony Panther, php-webdriver, or Codeception's WebDriver module.
  • API tests - send HTTP requests and assert on status codes and JSON, with Codeception's REST module or with PHPUnit and the Guzzle HTTP client.

PHP Testing Frameworks Compared

The latest release, release month, and minimum PHP version below come from each package's page on Packagist, the main Composer repository, and the installs column is Packagist's average daily installs for September 2026.

FrameworkBest forLatest releaseNeeds PHPDaily installs (Sep 2026)
PHPUnitUnit tests13.4.1 (Oct 2026)8.4.1+688,781
PestReadable unit tests5.3.1 (Oct 2026)8.4+249,049
CodeceptionUnit, functional, acceptance, and API tests5.3.7 (Oct 2026)8.2+53,996
BehatGherkin acceptance tests4.0.0 (Sep 2026)8.2 to 8.562,415
PHPSpecSpec-first class design8.3.1 (Jul 2026)8.2 to 8.57,724
Kahlandescribe-it specs6.1.2 (Sep 2026)7.4+731
Laravel DuskLaravel browser tests8.7.1 (Sep 2026)8.1+43,675
Symfony PantherBrowser tests in any PHP app2.4.0 (Jan 2026)8.1+20,884
php-webdriverSelenium from PHP1.16.0 (Dec 2025)7.3+111,147
MockeryTest doubles1.6.15 (Aug 2026)7.3+480,285
InfectionMutation testing0.35.6 (Oct 2026)8.3+52,335

Three names that still appear in older PHP testing roundups are not worth adopting: Packagist marks Storyplayer (last release in April 2016) and atoum as abandoned, and Peridot has not shipped a release since January 2017.

Unit Testing Frameworks for PHP

Unit tests are where most PHP suites start, because they run in milliseconds and need no browser or database. PHPUnit and Pest both cover this layer, and since Pest runs on PHPUnit, choosing between them is mostly a choice of syntax.

1. PHPUnit

PHPUnit is the xUnit-style framework that much of PHP testing builds on: Pest runs on it, Codeception's unit tests use it, and Infection mutates code against it. Each test class extends TestCase, and assertion methods such as assertSame() check the results.

According to the PHPUnit supported versions page, PHPUnit 13 was released on February 6, 2026 and needs PHP 8.4 or later, while PHPUnit 12 needs PHP 8.3.

This test checks an App\Calculator class whose add() method returns the sum of two integers, using two named data sets:

<?php
use App\Calculator;
use PHPUnit\Framework\Attributes\DataProvider;
use PHPUnit\Framework\TestCase;

final class CalculatorTest extends TestCase
{
    public static function sums(): array
    {
        return ['positives' => [2, 2, 4], 'negatives' => [-1, -1, -2]];
    }

    #[DataProvider('sums')]
    public function testAdds(int $a, int $b, int $expected): void
    {
        $this->assertSame($expected, (new Calculator())->add($a, $b));
    }
}

Running ./vendor/bin/phpunit tests with PHPUnit 13.4.1 printed:

PHPUnit 13.4.1 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.

Runtime:       PHP 8.4.26

..                                                            2 / 2 (100%)

Time: 00:00.001, Memory: 20.00 MB

OK (2 tests, 2 assertions)

Older tutorials put the data provider in a doc-comment, as /** @dataProvider sums */. With that comment in place of the attribute, PHPUnit 13.4.1 ignored the provider and ran the test once with no arguments, failing with ArgumentCountError: Too few arguments ... 0 passed ... and exactly 3 expected.

The PHPUnit 12 release announcement confirms that support for annotations has been removed, so convert doc-comments to attributes before you upgrade.

2. Pest

Pest is a function-based framework that runs on top of PHPUnit: tests are it() closures with expect() chains instead of classes. Installing pestphp/pest 5.3.1 pulled in PHPUnit 13.4.1 as its engine, and Pest 5 needs PHP 8.4 or later. Here is the same calculator test in Pest:

<?php
use App\Calculator;

it('adds two numbers', function (int $a, int $b, int $expected) {
    expect((new Calculator())->add($a, $b))->toBe($expected);
})->with([
    'positives' => [2, 2, 4],
    'negatives' => [-1, -1, -2],
]);

Pest names each data set in its output. Running ./vendor/bin/pest printed:

   PASS  Tests\CalculatorTest
  ✓ it adds two numbers with dataset "positives"                   0.01s
  ✓ it adds two numbers with dataset "negatives"

  Tests:    2 passed (2 assertions)
  Duration: 0.26s

Pest's browser testing plugin, introduced in Pest 4, runs browser tests through Playwright in Chrome, Firefox, or Safari, so browser checks can live in the same test suite as your other Pest tests.

PHPUnit vs Pest: Which Should You Use?

Both run the same assertions on the same engine, so the comparison comes down to syntax and tooling:

AspectPHPUnitPest
Test styleClasses that extend TestCase, one method per testit() and test() closures in plain PHP files
Assertions$this->assertSame() and other assertion methodsexpect($value)->toBe() chains
Data setsA #[DataProvider] attribute and a static provider method->with([...]) on the test
EnginePHPUnit itselfRuns on PHPUnit; Pest 5.3.1 installed PHPUnit 13.4.1
Existing PHPUnit testsRun as they areAlso run: a PHPUnit class passed alongside Pest tests in one pest run
Pick it whenYou maintain a large class-based suite or rely on PHPUnit-first toolingYou start a new project or want shorter tests and Pest's browser plugin

Because Pest also runs PHPUnit classes, an existing suite can move to Pest one file at a time.

BDD and Acceptance Testing Frameworks for PHP

Behavior-driven development describes software in terms of behavior the whole team can read. In PHP it comes in two forms: scenario-level tests in plain language (Codeception and Behat) and spec-level descriptions of a single class (PHPSpec and Kahlan).

3. Codeception

Codeception's own site calls it a BDD-styled PHP testing framework. It covers unit tests built on PHPUnit, functional tests through modules for Symfony, Laravel, and Yii, acceptance tests in a real browser through its WebDriver module, and REST or SOAP API tests.

Tests are Cest classes in which an actor, $I, performs readable steps, and this guide to PHP testing with Codeception covers setup in depth. The acceptance suite below runs on TestMu AI's Selenium grid, reading credentials from environment variables once codeception.yml lists params: - env:

actor: AcceptanceTester
suite_namespace: Tests\Acceptance
modules:
    enabled:
        - WebDriver:
            url: https://www.testmuai.com
            host: '%LT_USERNAME%:%LT_ACCESS_KEY%@hub.lambdatest.com'
            port: 443
            protocol: https
            browser: chrome
            capabilities:
                browserVersion: latest
                'LT:Options':
                    platformName: Windows 11
                    build: PHP Testing Frameworks
                    name: Codeception SimpleFormCest
<?php
namespace Tests\Acceptance;

use Tests\Support\AcceptanceTester;

final class SimpleFormCest
{
    public function showsTypedMessage(AcceptanceTester $I): void
    {
        $I->amOnPage('/selenium-playground/simple-form-demo/');
        $I->waitForJS('return document.readyState === "complete";', 10);
        $I->fillField('input#user-message', 'Hello from Codeception');
        $I->click('#showInput');
        $I->see('Hello from Codeception', '#message');
    }
}

Running codecept run Acceptance --steps with Codeception 5.3.7 printed each step in plain English and passed on Chrome 154 on Windows 11 (excerpt):

Scenario --
 I am on page "/selenium-playground/simple-form-demo/"
 I wait for js "return document.readyState === "complete";",10
 I fill field "input#user-message","Hello from Codeception"
 I click "#showInput"
 I see "Hello from Codeception","#message"
 PASSED

TestMu AI's Codeception integration guide shows the same WebDriver module settings for running Codeception on the grid.

4. Behat

Behat runs scenarios written in Gherkin, the Given/When/Then format, and maps each step to a PHP method in a context class.

The Behat 4.0 release notes say contexts no longer support PHPUnit assertions unless you add the behat/phpunit-assertions-extension package.

This feature and context ran on Behat 4.0.0, with steps bound through PHP 8 attributes:

Feature: Shopping cart
  Scenario: Add an item to the cart
    When I add "MacBook Air" to the cart
    Then the cart should contain 1 item
<?php
use Behat\Behat\Context\Context;
use Behat\Step\{Then, When};

final class FeatureContext implements Context
{
    private array $cart = [];

    #[When('I add :product to the cart')]
    public function add(string $product): void { $this->cart[] = $product; }

    #[Then('the cart should contain :count item(s)')]
    public function hasItems(int $count): void
    {
        count($this->cart) === $count
            or throw new RuntimeException('Cart count mismatch');
    }
}
Feature: Shopping cart

  Scenario: Add an item to the cart      # features\cart.feature:2
    When I add "MacBook Air" to the cart # FeatureContext::add()
    Then the cart should contain 1 item  # FeatureContext::hasItems()

1 scenario (1 passed)
2 steps (2 passed)
0m0.03s (10.47Mb)

Changing the expected count to 2 failed the Then step with Cart count mismatch (RuntimeException) and exit code 1, so a wrong count does fail the scenario. TestMu AI's Behat guide covers running Behat browser tests on the grid, including locally hosted pages.

5. PHPSpec

PHPSpec's documentation describes it as a toolset to drive emergent design by specification. You first describe the behavior of an object you are about to write, then write just enough code to meet that spec, then refactor.

The same documentation pairs it with story-level tools such as Behat instead of replacing them: specs shape how a class works, while Behat scenarios check what users see.

6. Kahlan

Kahlan is a unit and BDD framework with RSpec-style describe() and it() blocks. Its README says it can stub or monkey patch code without any PECL extension, including replacing core functions and classes on the fly, so specs rarely need a separate mocking library.

It is also the least installed framework in the table above, so check that its small community fits your support needs before adopting it.

Note

Note: Unit tests run wherever PHP runs. For the browser layer, TestMu AI runs Selenium PHP, Codeception, Behat, and Laravel Dusk suites in parallel across 3,000+ browser and OS combinations. Try TestMu AI free

Browser and E2E Testing Tools for PHP

Unit tests cannot catch a button that never renders or a script that fails only in Safari, so browser tests drive a real browser through the W3C WebDriver protocol. Laravel Dusk targets Laravel apps, Symfony Panther works in Symfony and plain PHP projects, and php-webdriver gives any PHP code direct access to Selenium.

7. Laravel Dusk

Laravel's Dusk documentation describes it as a browser automation and testing API that needs no JDK or Selenium install by default, because it runs a standalone ChromeDriver.

The same documentation shows how to edit the driver() method in tests/DuskTestCase.php so Dusk connects to any Selenium-compatible server instead.

Install it with composer require laravel/dusk --dev, then run php artisan dusk:install to create tests/Browser and download ChromeDriver. This guide to getting started with Laravel testing walks through Dusk tests in a real app, and TestMu AI's Laravel Dusk guide covers the driver change for the grid.

8. Symfony Panther

Symfony Panther's README calls it a standalone library to scrape websites and run end-to-end tests using real browsers, driving Chrome and Firefox through the W3C WebDriver protocol. Because it is standalone, it also works in PHP projects that do not use Symfony.

9. php-webdriver

php-webdriver is the PHP language binding for Selenium WebDriver and, per its README, works with Selenium server 2.x, 3.x, and 4.x. It replaced facebook/webdriver, which Packagist now marks as abandoned in favor of php-webdriver/webdriver.

Other tools build on it: Laravel's Dusk documentation creates the driver with its RemoteWebDriver class, and installing Codeception's WebDriver module pulled in php-webdriver 1.16.0 as a dependency.

Running PHP Browser Tests on a Cloud Grid

Browser tests are slow and browser-specific, so they gain the most from parallel cloud runs. TestMu AI's Automation Cloud runs existing Selenium scripts, PHP included, on real browsers and operating systems in parallel: you point RemoteWebDriver at the hub instead of a local driver, with no rewrite.

The PHPUnit test below runs the Simple Form Demo on TestMu AI's Selenium Playground in Chrome and Firefox on Windows 11 and Safari on macOS Sequoia. The file, grid/SimpleFormTest.php, appears in three parts; part 1 holds the imports, the hub URL, and the browser list:

<?php
use Facebook\WebDriver\Remote\RemoteWebDriver;
use Facebook\WebDriver\WebDriverBy as By;
use PHPUnit\Framework\Attributes\DataProvider;
use PHPUnit\Framework\TestCase;

final class SimpleFormTest extends TestCase
{
    private const HUB = 'https://%s:%s@hub.lambdatest.com/wd/hub';

    public static function browsers(): array
    {
        return ['Chrome' => ['Chrome', 'Windows 11'],
            'Firefox' => ['Firefox', 'Windows 11'],
            'Safari' => ['Safari', 'macOS Sequoia']];
    }

Part 2 opens the session. Credentials come from the LT_USERNAME and LT_ACCESS_KEY environment variables and go into the hub URL, while LT:Options names the platform, build, and test:

    #[DataProvider('browsers')]
    public function testShowsTypedMessage(string $browser, string $os): void
    {
        $hub = sprintf(self::HUB,
            getenv('LT_USERNAME'), getenv('LT_ACCESS_KEY'));
        $driver = RemoteWebDriver::create($hub, [
            'browserName' => $browser,
            'browserVersion' => 'latest',
            'LT:Options' => [
                'platformName' => $os,
                'build' => 'PHP Testing Frameworks', 'name' => $browser,
            ],
        ]);
        try {
            $driver->get('https://www.testmuai.com/'
                . 'selenium-playground/simple-form-demo/');

Part 3 waits for the page, types a message, clicks the button, checks the result, and reports the outcome to the dashboard with lambda-status:

            // Safari can start unfocused; wait for focus before typing
            $driver->wait(20)->until(fn ($d) => $d->executeScript(
                'return document.readyState === "complete"'
                . ' && document.hasFocus();'));
            $driver->findElement(By::cssSelector('input#user-message'))
                ->sendKeys('Hello from PHP');
            $driver->findElement(By::id('showInput'))->click();
            $text = $driver->findElement(By::id('message'))->getText();
            $this->assertSame('Hello from PHP', $text);
            $driver->executeScript('lambda-status=passed');
        } catch (Throwable $e) {
            $driver->executeScript('lambda-status=failed');
            throw $e;
        } finally {
            $driver->quit();
        }
    }
}

Keep the credentials in the hub URL. When a session request failed during setup, php-webdriver's WebDriverCurlException printed the full capabilities JSON, so an access key placed in LT:Options appeared in plain text in the PHPUnit output and would land in any CI log; with the key in the URL, the same exception showed neither the username nor the key.

Run one browser at a time, the three sessions took 53.5 seconds.

ParaTest adds parallel testing to PHPUnit, and its --functional option parallelizes by individual test instead of by test class, so each browser data set gets its own process:

export LT_USERNAME="your-username"
export LT_ACCESS_KEY="your-access-key"
composer require --dev brianium/paratest
./vendor/bin/paratest --processes=3 --functional grid

With three processes, the same suite finished in 22.7 to 27.7 seconds across three runs. The end of one run (configuration path and progress dots omitted):

ParaTest v7.26.1 upon PHPUnit 13.4.1 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.

Processes:     3
Runtime:       PHP 8.4.26

Time: 00:22.694, Memory: 14.00 MB

OK (3 tests, 3 assertions)

Safari is the reason for the focus wait in part 3. Without it, the typed text reached the input in every Safari 18 probe session, yet the form printed the message in only 11 of 38 sessions, and document.hasFocus() was still false when typing began. With the wait, Safari passed all 8 probe sessions and every final run in build 108234533.

Each session recorded a video and screenshots in the TestMu AI dashboard. The PHP with Selenium guide covers the full grid setup, and if an AI coding agent writes your tests, the Selenium skill includes a PHP pattern for the grid. TestMu AI's agent skills also cover Codeception, Behat, and Laravel Dusk.

Skip the setup: install the Selenium Skill so your AI coding agent writes PHP WebDriver tests for the TestMu AI grid.

Selenium

Mocking and Mutation Testing Tools for PHP

Mockery isolates the class under test from its dependencies, and Infection measures whether the suite would notice a deliberately injected bug.

10. Mockery

Mockery's README describes it as a simple yet flexible mock object framework for PHPUnit, PHPSpec, or any other test framework. In this test, App\Order::checkout() charges an App\PaymentGateway, an interface with one charge(int $amount): bool method, and the mock replaces the real gateway:

<?php
use App\Order;
use App\PaymentGateway;
use Mockery\Adapter\Phpunit\MockeryPHPUnitIntegration;
use PHPUnit\Framework\TestCase;

final class OrderTest extends TestCase
{
    use MockeryPHPUnitIntegration;

    public function testCheckoutChargesTheGatewayOnce(): void
    {
        $gateway = Mockery::mock(PaymentGateway::class);
        $gateway->shouldReceive('charge')->once()->with(100)
            ->andReturn(true);
        $this->assertTrue((new Order($gateway))->checkout(100));
    }
}

The MockeryPHPUnitIntegration trait checks expectations when the test ends. With the checkout() call removed, the test failed with InvalidCountException: Method charge(100) ... should be called exactly 1 times but called 0 times.

11. Infection

Infection is a mutation testing framework: it changes your code in small ways, such as turning > into >=, and reruns the tests against each mutant. Infection's guide defines the Mutation Score Indicator (MSI) as the share of mutants the tests detect and lists PHP 8.3 or later plus a coverage driver as requirements.

The guide lists Xdebug, PCOV, and phpdbg as drivers, but PHPUnit 13.4.1 rejected phpdbg with No code coverage driver available that supports line coverage, so use PCOV or Xdebug with PHPUnit 13. This discount class had two passing tests, for orders of 150 and 50, and full line coverage:

<?php
namespace App;

final class Discount
{
    // Orders above 100 get 10 percent off
    public function apply(int $total): float
    {
        return $total > 100 ? $total * 0.9 : (float) $total;
    }
}

Running ./vendor/bin/infection src/Discount.php with PCOV 1.0.12 produced this excerpt, the escaped-mutant diffs and the summary:

-        return $total > 100 ? $total * 0.9 : (float) $total;
+        return $total >= 100 ? $total * 0.9 : (float) $total;

-        return $total > 100 ? $total * 0.9 : (float) $total;
+        return $total > 100 ? $total * 0.9 : $total;

5 mutations were generated:
       3 mutants were killed by Test Framework
       2 covered mutants were not detected

Metrics:
         Mutation Code Coverage: 100%
         Covered Code MSI: 60%

The first survivor is a real gap: no test checks an order of exactly 100, so a >= bug would ship. The second is an equivalent mutant, because the float return type already converts the integer, which makes the (float) cast dead code. After adding a test for 100 and deleting the cast, Infection generated 4 mutants and the tests killed all 4.

TDD vs BDD in PHP

Test-driven development (TDD) is a developer loop: write a failing unit test, write the minimum code to pass it, then refactor. Behavior-driven development (BDD) frames tests as behavior that non-developers can read, and this TDD vs BDD comparison covers the trade-offs in depth.

AspectTDDBDD
FocusDoes the unit of code work correctlyDoes the software behave as users expect
AudienceDevelopersDevelopers, QA, and business stakeholders
LanguageAssertions in codePlain-language scenarios or specs
Typical PHP toolsPHPUnit, Pest, MockeryBehat, Codeception, PHPSpec, Kahlan

The two work together: TDD with PHPUnit or Pest for classes, and BDD with Behat or Codeception for the flows users care about.

How to Test PHP Code Locally

A local PHPUnit setup needs Composer, a PHP version the framework supports (8.4 for PHPUnit 13), and an autoload rule so tests can load your classes. This composer.json is enough for the calculator example:

{
    "autoload": { "psr-4": { "App\\": "src/" } },
    "require-dev": { "phpunit/phpunit": "^13.4" }
}

With the class in src/ and the test in tests/, these commands install PHPUnit and run the suite:

composer install
./vendor/bin/phpunit tests
./vendor/bin/phpunit tests --filter testAdds
./vendor/bin/phpunit tests --coverage-filter src --coverage-text
  • composer install - downloads PHPUnit into vendor/ as a dev dependency.
  • phpunit tests - runs every file in tests/ whose name ends in Test.php; in Windows cmd or PowerShell, call vendor\bin\phpunit instead.
  • --filter - runs only the tests whose names match, which keeps the TDD loop fast.
  • --coverage-text - needs PCOV or Xdebug, and without a phpunit.xml it also needs --coverage-filter src, or PHPUnit warns that no filter is configured.

With PCOV 1.0.12 loaded, the last command reported full line coverage for App\Calculator. For HTML and XML output, see this guide to PHPUnit coverage reports in HTML and XML.

Choosing Your PHP Testing Stack

Start with the unit framework that fits your codebase, Pest 5 for a new project or PHPUnit 13 for a large class-based suite, and run Infection once to see which behavior your tests miss. When you add browser tests, connect them to TestMu AI's Selenium automation platform with the PHPUnit with Selenium guide, and include Safari from the first run.

Author

...

Himanshu Sheth

Blogs: 142

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Himanshu Sheth is the Director of Marketing (Technical Content) at TestMu AI, with over 8 years of hands-on experience in Selenium, Cypress, and other test automation frameworks. He has authored more than 130 technical blogs for TestMu AI, covering software testing, automation strategy, and CI/CD. At TestMu AI, he leads the technical content efforts across blogs, YouTube, and social media, while closely collaborating with contributors to enhance content quality and product feedback loops. He has done his graduation with a B.E. in Computer Engineering from Mumbai University. Before TestMu AI, Himanshu led engineering teams in embedded software domains at companies like Samsung Research, Motorola, and NXP Semiconductors. He is a core member of DZone and has been a speaker at several unconferences focused on technical writing and software quality.

Reviewer

...

Navin Chandra

Reviewer

  • Linkedin

Navin Chandra is a Member of Technical Staff at TestMu AI, building the open-source automation that powers its Selenium and Appium cloud grid. A committer to both Selenium and Appium, he implemented WebDriver BiDi support in Selenium for real-time browser events and bidirectional control and is developing Apple's iOS RemoteXPC protocol in Appium to enable low-level wireless communication with iOS system services. He contributes to Selenium across multiple language bindings as a member of the Selenium GitHub organization. He has served as a Google Summer of Code mentee and mentor at openSUSE and an LFX mentee at CNCF's KubeArmor, and is a SUSE Certified Deployment Specialist. Navin holds a B.Tech in Computer Science.

Add to Google preferred sources

Summarise with AI

Copied to Clipboard!
...

3000+ Browsers. One Platform.

See exactly how your site performs everywhere.

Try it free
...

Write Tests in Plain English with KaneAI

Create, debug, and evolve tests using natural language.

Try for free

PHP Testing Frameworks FAQs

Did you find this page helpful?

More Related Blogs

TestMu AI forEnterprise

Get access to solutions built on Enterprise
grade security, privacy, & compliance

  • Advanced access controls
  • Advanced data retention rules
  • Advanced Local Testing
  • Premium Support options
  • Early access to beta features
  • Private Slack Channel
  • Unlimited Manual Accessibility DevTools Tests