Run Tests Up to 70% Faster than Traditional Test Grids
HyperExecute Is an AI-Native Test Orchestration Platform to Run Your Automation Test Suites with Blazing Fast Speed.
Jest ESM TypeScript Setup: ts-jest, Babel, SWC or Node Type Stripping
Jest ESM TypeScript setup for Jest 30.5: the Node flag, extensionsToTreatAsEsm, .js import mapping, and ts-jest on TypeScript 7, Babel, SWC or no transform.
Published on:
You switch package.json to "type": "module" so Node runs your TypeScript build as ES modules, and the next npx jest run stops before a single assertion. The tests are fine: Jest still executes CommonJS by default, and running TypeScript as native ESM takes a Node flag, one Jest option and a transform that leaves import statements in place.
This Jest ESM TypeScript setup targets Jest 30.5.2, the latest release on npm on November 11, 2026, and every option in it is checked against that day's Jest, ts-jest, SWC, Babel and TypeScript docs. If your tests still compile to CommonJS, the ts-jest steps in the guide to unit testing with Jest are the shorter path.
Recent releases also change older advice: TypeScript 7.0, a native port that Microsoft calls 10x faster, shipped on July 8, 2026 without the JavaScript compiler API that ts-jest loads, and Jest 30.5.2 can erase TypeScript types with Node alone.
Overview
To run TypeScript tests as native ESM in Jest 30.5, start Node with the --experimental-vm-modules flag, add .ts to extensionsToTreatAsEsm, and use a transform that emits ES modules or an empty one. Pick the transform by whether tests must type-check during the run and which Node.js version runs them.
Which Transform Should You Use for Jest ESM With TypeScript?
- Type-checked test runs: ts-jest 29.4.15 with useESM: true, the setting its createDefaultEsmPreset() applies to .ts, .tsx and .mts files. Type-checks during the run: yes with module set to ES2022 or ESNext, no under nodenext, which requires isolatedModules. Runs on Node.js 20: yes. TypeScript 7: only through the @typescript/typescript6 npm alias.
- Projects already on Babel: babel-jest 30.5.2, Jest's default transform, keeps ES modules because it passes Jest's static ESM flag to Babel, which preset-env reads. Type-checks: no. Babel 8 on Node.js 20: no, Babel 8 needs 22.18+ or 24.11+, so Node 20 stays on Babel 7.
- Rust-based transpiling: @swc/jest 0.2.39 switches SWC's output to ES modules whenever Jest reports static ESM support, so the flag and extensionsToTreatAsEsm are the whole setup. Type-checks: no. Runs on Node.js 20: yes.
- No transformer at all: Jest 30.5.2 strips types through Node when the transform is empty. Type-checks: no. Node.js: 22.13+ or 23.2+. Supports enum, namespace, parameter properties or .tsx files: no, those still need Babel or ts-jest.
Running the ESM Suite in CI
Put the Node flag in the package.json test script so every runner inherits it. TestMu AI's HyperExecute docs run Jest through npm test from hyperexecute.yaml, and the Node.js versions its runtime key can install stop at 20, which suits ts-jest, @swc/jest or Babel 7 rather than Node type stripping.
Do You Need Native ESM in Jest?
You need native ESM in Jest when Node runs your code as ES modules, or when the code uses syntax that CommonJS cannot express. Jest 30.5's ECMAScript Modules guide still calls its ESM support experimental, so if none of the cases below applies, the CommonJS path is the simpler one to keep.
- Node runs the code as ESM - your package.json sets
"type": "module", which TypeScript's compiler options guide asks for when you emit ES modules for Node, and the tests import those modules directly. - import.meta or top-level await - neither compiles to CommonJS, so a transform that targets CommonJS cannot run that code; the tsc output below shows both errors.
- ESM-only dependencies - a package that ships only ES modules fails in a CommonJS run unless Jest transforms it or loads it as ESM, as the next section shows.
TypeScript 5.9.3 reported both errors when a file with top-level await and a file that reads import.meta.url compiled with "module": "commonjs" (output trimmed and wrapped):
src/config.ts(1,13): error TS1378: Top-level 'await'
expressions are only allowed when the 'module' option is
set to 'es2022', 'esnext', 'system', 'node16', ...
src/paths.ts(1,21): error TS1343: The 'import.meta'
meta-property is only allowed when the '--module' option
is 'es2020', 'es2022', 'esnext', 'system', 'node16', ...A bundled app can stay on CommonJS in Jest. TypeScript's guide pairs bundler projects with "module": "esnext" and "moduleResolution": "bundler" and recommends not setting "type": "module" in them for now, so ts-jest's default CommonJS preset keeps working. If ESM friction is the reason you are weighing a switch of test runner, the Vitest vs Jest comparison covers that trade-off.
ESM-Only Packages in a CommonJS Test Run
Jest does not transform files in node_modules by default, so a dependency published only as ES modules breaks a CommonJS run. Jest's transformIgnorePatterns docs give the CommonJS fix: an allowlist pattern, so your transformer converts that package too.
export default {
transformIgnorePatterns: ['/node_modules/(?!(esm-only-pkg)/)'],
};- Babel config file - Babel's config file docs say project-wide babel.config files apply to node_modules, and that in a
"type": "module"package babel.config.js behaves like an .mjs file, which throws when Babel loads config synchronously. A require() in Jest transforms synchronously, so name the file babel.config.cjs. - Node 24.9 and later - Jest 30.4.0 added require() of ES modules there, and its release notes say it still requires --experimental-vm-modules, so the flag from Step 1 lets a CommonJS test require an ESM-only package without transforming it.
- Packages exported only under import - Jest follows Node: a package whose ESM entry sits only under the import condition cannot be required and fails with ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED, and a graph with top-level await throws ERR_REQUIRE_ASYNC_MODULE, per Jest's ECMAScript Modules guide.
- Older Node versions - below Node 24.9, Jest 30.5 falls back to your transform for ESM-marked files and replaced the generic "unexpected token" message with an ERR_REQUIRE_ESM error, according to the Jest 30.5.0 release notes.
Step 1: Turn On ESM Mode in Node and Jest
Jest evaluates ES modules through Node's node:vm module, and Node keeps the ES module part of that API behind a flag: its command-line docs describe --experimental-vm-modules as enabling "experimental ES Module support in the node:vm module". The check below ran on Node 25.5.0 on November 11, 2026 (warning lines wrapped).
import vm from 'node:vm';
console.log(typeof vm.SourceTextModule);
if (vm.SourceTextModule) new vm.SourceTextModule('export {}');$ node vm-check.mjs
undefined
$ node --experimental-vm-modules vm-check.mjs
function
(node:41892) ExperimentalWarning: VM Modules is an
experimental feature and might change at any time
(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the
warning was created)
$ node --experimental-vm-modules \
--disable-warning=ExperimentalWarning vm-check.mjs
function- Without the flag - vm.SourceTextModule is undefined, so Jest's ESM loader has no class to build modules with.
- With the flag - the class exists, and Node prints an ExperimentalWarning the first time a module is created.
- --disable-warning=ExperimentalWarning - hides that line, along with every other experimental-feature warning in the same process.
Put the flag in the test script rather than a shell profile, so local runs, CI and cloud runners all start Jest the same way. The ESM guide gives two forms, and the node form below needs no environment variable, which also spares Windows users the cross-env package the guide suggests for NODE_OPTIONS.
{
"type": "module",
"scripts": {
"test": "node --experimental-vm-modules node_modules/jest/bin/jest.js"
}
}The config file needs the same switch. Under "type": "module", Node treats jest.config.js as an ES module, so a CommonJS config fails before Jest reads a single option; loading one in Node 25.5.0 printed this (path shortened, lines wrapped):
ReferenceError: module is not defined in ES module scope
This file is being treated as an ES module because it has
a '.js' file extension and '<project>/package.json'
contains "type": "module". To treat it as a CommonJS
script, rename it to use the '.cjs' file extension.Write the config with export default instead. Jest's changelog lists defineConfig as new in Jest 30.3.0, the jest package exports it to ES modules, and a JavaScript file also skips the ts-node loader that Jest's configuration docs say a jest.config.ts needs by default.
import { defineConfig } from 'jest';
export default defineConfig({
testEnvironment: 'node',
extensionsToTreatAsEsm: ['.ts'],
});- extensionsToTreatAsEsm - Jest already runs .mjs files, and .js files under a
"type": "module"package.json, as ES modules; .ts files run as ESM only when their extension is listed here. - supportsStaticESM - Jest's code transformation docs say a transformer is told it may emit ESM only when the file's extension is in extensionsToTreatAsEsm and Node runs with the flag, and every transform in Step 2 reads that value.
- The jest object - ES modules get no injected jest global, so import it from @jest/globals or use import.meta.jest, as the ESM guide shows.
- Global types - TypeScript 6.0 changed the types default to an empty list and TypeScript 7.0 kept it, per Microsoft's announcement, so describe and expect from @types/jest stop resolving until you add jest to types. Importing them from @jest/globals avoids the setting.
For code that Node runs directly, TypeScript's guide sets "module": "nodenext" and recommends verbatimModuleSyntax. The isolatedModules line is there for ts-jest, whose ESM guide accepts nodenext only with it, though it also stops ts-jest from type-checking, as Step 2 explains:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"module": "nodenext",
"strict": true,
"isolatedModules": true,
"verbatimModuleSyntax": true
}
}Step 2: Pick a TypeScript Transform That Emits ESM
Jest's default transform runs babel-jest on every .js, .jsx, .ts and .tsx file, and the ESM guide leaves you a choice: switch transforms off with an empty transform, or use one that emits ESM instead of CommonJS. The table compares the TypeScript routes as their docs and published packages stood on November 11, 2026.
| Route | Type-checks during the run | How it emits ESM | Requirements | Watch for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ts-jest 29.4.15 | Yes with module ES2022 or ESNext; no with isolatedModules | useESM: true, or createDefaultEsmPreset() | TypeScript 4.3 to 6.x; TypeScript 7 through npm aliases | nodenext needs isolatedModules, so no type-check |
| babel-jest 30.5.2 | No, Babel only transpiles | Automatic, from the caller flags Jest passes | Babel 7, or Babel 8 on Node.js 22.18+ or 24.11+ | Name the config babel.config.cjs |
| @swc/jest 0.2.39 | No, SWC only transpiles | Automatic, module type es6 in ESM mode | @swc/core installed beside it | Reads .swcrc by default |
| No transform (Jest 30.5.2) | No, Node only erases types | transform: {} | Node.js ^22.13.0 or >=23.2.0 | No enum, namespace, parameter properties or .tsx |
ts-jest With useESM
ts-jest's ESM support guide shows configs with and without its preset creator functions, and in ts-jest 29.4.15 createDefaultEsmPreset() returns exactly the two settings below: .ts, .tsx and .mts as ESM, plus a ts-jest transform with useESM: true. Written out, they fit in a plain jest.config.js that needs no import from ts-jest:
export default {
testEnvironment: 'node',
extensionsToTreatAsEsm: ['.ts', '.tsx', '.mts'],
transform: {
'^.+\\.m?tsx?$': ['ts-jest', { useESM: true }],
},
};- Module setting - the guide accepts ES module values such as ES2022 and ESNext, which it recommends, or the hybrid Node16, Node18 and NodeNext values, which need isolatedModules: true in tsconfig and
"type": "module"in package.json. - Type-checking - ts-jest type-checks through the TypeScript compiler by default, but its isolatedModules docs say compiling each file on its own gives that up, and ts-jest 29.4.15 reads that mode from isolatedModules in tsconfig. Under nodenext the run skips the check, so either pass ts-jest a tsconfig with module set to ES2022 or ESNext through its tsconfig option, or keep tsc --noEmit in the pipeline.
- Mocking - the same guide still says mocking ES modules is not supported yet; Jest's own ESM guide documents jest.unstable_mockModule, covered in Step 4.
babel-jest With @babel/preset-typescript
Jest's getting-started guide sets up TypeScript through Babel with @babel/preset-env and @babel/preset-typescript, and warns that Babel only transpiles, so Jest will not type-check the tests. ESM needs no extra Babel option: babel-jest 30.5.2 passes Jest's supportsStaticESM value in Babel's caller data, and preset-env's default modules setting uses caller data to decide whether to keep import statements.
// babel.config.cjs
module.exports = {
presets: [
['@babel/preset-env', { targets: { node: 'current' } }],
'@babel/preset-typescript',
],
};// jest.config.js (babel-jest is the default transform)
export default {
testEnvironment: 'node',
extensionsToTreatAsEsm: ['.ts'],
};- modules: "auto" - leave preset-env's modules option at its default, because a fixed "commonjs" converts imports even when Jest runs the file as ESM.
- Babel 8 and Node - @babel/core 8.1.0, the current npm release, declares Node.js
^22.18.0 || >=24.11.0in its engines field. On Node 20, install the 7 line, whose v7 tag on npm points at 7.29.13 from November 4, 2026. - jest.mock hoisting - babel-jest adds the plugin that hoists jest.mock calls, which helps CommonJS tests only; ES module tests use the pattern in Step 4.
@swc/jest With ES Module Output
SWC's Jest guide offers @swc/jest as a drop-in Rust replacement, installs jest, @swc/core and @swc/jest, and describes the TypeScript ESM setup as extensionsToTreatAsEsm for .ts and .tsx plus the Node flag. The transformer does the rest: in @swc/jest 0.2.39, still the latest release, the published index.js sets SWC's module type to es6 when Jest reports static ESM support and to commonjs when it does not.
export default {
testEnvironment: 'node',
extensionsToTreatAsEsm: ['.ts', '.tsx'],
transform: {
'^.+\\.(t|j)sx?$': '@swc/jest',
},
};- .swcrc - @swc/jest reads it only when the transform tuple passes no options, which is why SWC's guide loads the file itself and spreads it into the tuple when you add options.
- No type-check - SWC's migration guide says SWC only transpiles the code and does not perform type checking, so tsc --noEmit stays a separate step.
No Transform: Node Type Stripping in Jest 30.5.2
Jest 30.5.2 lets Node do the work: when no transformer claims a .ts, .mts or .cts file, Jest passes it through Node's module.stripTypeScriptTypes(). The Next version of Jest's getting-started page documents it with an empty transform and Node.js ^22.13.0 or >=23.2.0.
export default {
testEnvironment: 'node',
extensionsToTreatAsEsm: ['.ts'],
transform: {},
};The function is Node's own, so its output is easy to preview. These three files went through stripTypeScriptTypes(code, { mode: 'strip' }), the call in Jest's published transform build, on Node 25.5.0:
// sum.ts
export function sum(a: number, b: number): number {
return a + b;
}
// user.ts
import type { User } from './types.js';
export const name = (u: User): string => u.name;
// status.ts
export enum Status {
Active,
Disabled,
}Types became spaces, the import type line disappeared and the enum was rejected (error line wrapped):
--- sum.ts
export function sum(a , b ) {
return a + b;
}
--- user.ts
export const name = (u ) => u.name;
--- status.ts
ERR_UNSUPPORTED_TYPESCRIPT_SYNTAX:
TypeScript enum is not supported in strip-only mode- Code that emits JavaScript - enum, namespace and parameter properties throw, and .tsx is left alone, so JSX still needs Babel or ts-jest.
- ESM stays opt-in - .ts and .mts files need their extension in extensionsToTreatAsEsm, because Jest does not infer the module format from .mts or .cts yet.
- No jest.mock hoisting - babel-plugin-jest-hoist is not running, which ES module tests do not rely on anyway.
- import type - a type imported as a value survives the erasure and fails at link time, so write import type for anything that exists only in the type system.
- No compiler at test time - Node erases the types, so the test run itself needs no typescript package.
TypeScript can enforce the same limits before Jest runs. With erasableSyntaxOnly and verbatimModuleSyntax set to true in tsconfig, tsc 5.9.3 flagged an enum file and a value-style type import in a sample project (lines wrapped):
src/status.ts(1,13): error TS1294: This syntax is not
allowed when 'erasableSyntaxOnly' is enabled.
src/user.ts(1,10): error TS1484: 'User' is a type and must
be imported using a type-only import when
'verbatimModuleSyntax' is enabled.Step 3: Map .js Imports Back to .ts Files
Under "module": "nodenext", TypeScript checks imports the way Node resolves them, so a relative import has to name the compiled .js file. tsc 5.9.3 rejected the extensionless form in a sample project and passed once the import read './sum.js' (lines wrapped):
src/total.ts(1,21): error TS2835: Relative import paths
need explicit file extensions in ECMAScript imports when
'--moduleResolution' is 'node16' or 'nodenext'. Did you
mean './sum.js'?Jest resolves that specifier as written. The default resolver in jest-resolve 30.5.1 passes no extension alias to unrs-resolver, and the file on disk is sum.ts, so the import fails unless a moduleNameMapper entry rewrites it first. Jest's configuration docs define the mapper as regular expressions mapped to module names, with numbered backreferences and the first matching pattern winning.
moduleNameMapper: {
'^(\\.{1,2}/.*)\\.js$': '$1',
},The ^(\.{1,2}/.*) part limits the rewrite to relative paths. Applied to five specifiers the way jest-resolve applies it (match first, then substitute the capture group), the entry printed this in Node 25.5.0:
./sum.js -> ./sum
../lib/db.js -> ../lib/db
./fixtures/user.json -> (no match, resolved as written)
lodash-es/debounce.js -> (no match, resolved as written)
uuid -> (no match, resolved as written)- The relative anchor - once a pattern matches, jest-resolve requires the mapped name to resolve and otherwise stops with a "Could not locate module ... mapped as" configuration error, so an unanchored .js pattern can break package subpath imports.
- Regex checks - a JavaScript regex tester shows what a mapper key matches before Jest sees it.
- Bundler-style imports - with
"moduleResolution": "bundler", relative imports carry no extension, and Jest finds the .ts file through moduleFileExtensions, whose default list includes ts.
Step 4: Mock ES Modules With jest.unstable_mockModule
Static imports are evaluated before any jest.mock() call runs, so the hoisting babel-jest performs for CommonJS cannot replace them. Jest's ESM guide documents jest.unstable_mockModule() instead: register the mock, then load the module under test with a dynamic await import().
import { jest, test, expect } from '@jest/globals';
jest.unstable_mockModule('./db.js', () => ({
getUser: jest.fn(async (id: number) => ({ id, name: 'Ada' })),
}));
const { getUser } = await import('./db.js');
const { greet } = await import('./greet.js');
test('greets the user that db.js returns', async () => {
await expect(greet(1)).resolves.toBe('Hello, Ada');
expect(getUser).toHaveBeenCalledWith(1);
});- Factory - the factory function is required, and it can be synchronous or async.
- jest.unstable_unmockModule() - restores the real module for imports that come after it.
- Automocks on Node 24.9+ - Jest 30.5 applies automocks and __mocks__ files to ES module graphs that evaluate synchronously; graphs with top-level await, or async-only resolvers and transformers, still need unstable_mockModule.
- CommonJS dependencies - jest.mock still works for CommonJS modules that the test loads through createRequire(import.meta.url).
ts-jest and TypeScript 7: Keep the TypeScript 6 API for Jest
The usual install command does not give you TypeScript 7. A dry run with npm 11.8.0 on November 11, 2026, resolved typescript to 6.0.3, because ts-jest 29.4.15 declares a peer range of >=4.3 <7, and the same command with typescript@7 stopped with ERESOLVE (output trimmed):
$ npm install --dry-run --save-dev \
jest ts-jest typescript @types/jest
add babel-jest 30.5.2
add typescript 6.0.3
add ts-jest 29.4.15
add jest 30.5.2
add @types/jest 30.0.0
$ npm install --dry-run --save-dev \
jest ts-jest typescript@7 @types/jest
npm error code ERESOLVE
npm error ERESOLVE unable to resolve dependency tree
npm error Found: typescript@7.0.2
npm error Could not resolve dependency:
npm error peer typescript@">=4.3 <7" from ts-jest@29.4.15The range is deliberate: Microsoft's TypeScript 7.0 announcement says the release "does not ship with an API" and expects a new, different one in TypeScript 7.1, and ts-jest's TypeScript 7 guide explains that ts-jest needs that JavaScript compiler API for transforms, diagnostics, source maps, hoisting and custom AST transformers.
ts-jest 29.4.12 added support for TypeScript 7 projects through npm aliases. TypeScript 7 installs as @typescript/native, so npx tsc runs the native compiler, and the @typescript/typescript6 compatibility package installs under the typescript name, which is the package ts-jest loads.
{
"devDependencies": {
"@typescript/native": "npm:typescript@^7.0.2",
"typescript": "npm:@typescript/typescript6@^6.0.2"
}
}- No overrides - the guide says not to bypass ERESOLVE with --legacy-peer-deps, and not to point ts-jest's compiler option at @typescript/native.
- tsc as the type check - Jest transforms run at TypeScript 6 speed and report TypeScript 6 diagnostics, so the guide makes npx tsc --noEmit the authoritative project check in development and CI.
- tsc6 - the compatibility package also ships a tsc6 binary for comparing results between the two compilers.
- TypeScript 6.0 defaults - TypeScript 7.0 keeps them, including strict on, module set to esnext and an empty types list, and it rejects moduleResolution node10 and baseUrl outright, per Microsoft's announcement.
- The other routes - babel-jest, @swc/jest and Node type stripping do not use the TypeScript compiler API, so TypeScript 7 only changes the tsc step for them.
Run the ESM Suite in CI and on HyperExecute
Because the flag lives in the test script, any runner that calls npm test starts Jest in ESM mode, and the Node version is the only other setting to pin. Match it to your route: type stripping needs Node.js ^22.13.0 or >=23.2.0, Jest's require() of ES modules needs 24.9 or later, and Babel 8 needs ^22.18.0 or >=24.11.0.
TestMu AI's Jest on HyperExecute guide runs a Jest suite from hyperexecute.yaml with Auto-Split: a discovery command lists the test files, and each VM in the concurrency pool runs the npm test command from testRunnerCommand on its share of them. The runtime key installs the Node.js version you name, and the supported languages and packages list shows Node.js 12 through 20 on Linux, Windows and macOS, so a suite headed there fits ts-jest, @swc/jest or Babel 7.
version: 0.1
runson: linux
autosplit: true
concurrency: 2
runtime:
- language: node
version: "20"
pre:
- npm install
cacheKey: '{{ checksum "package.json" }}'
cacheDirectories:
- node_modules
testDiscovery:
type: raw
mode: remote
command: grep -lr 'describe' src/*.test.ts
testRunnerCommand: npm test -- $testNote: Run the same npm test script on HyperExecute, the test orchestration cloud from TestMu AI, which splits the discovered Jest files across parallel VMs with Auto-Split and returns the logs and reports for the whole job.
Conclusion
Start with one test file: add the flag to the test script, export the Jest config as an ES module, list .ts in extensionsToTreatAsEsm, and pick the transform that your Node version and type-checking needs allow. Keep tsc --noEmit beside Jest whichever route you choose, since only ts-jest can type-check during the run, and on TypeScript 7 its diagnostics come from the TypeScript 6 API.
When the suite passes locally, the HyperExecute YAML reference covers the runtime, caching and discovery keys used above. If you are new to Jest itself, the Jest tutorial starts from the first test. For a suite that also tests React components, the React Testing Library vs Enzyme comparison covers which library to use and how to move an Enzyme suite across.
Running JavaScript test suites in CI? HyperExecute by TestMu AI runs them from one YAML file and splits test files across parallel cloud VMs.
Author
Himanshu Sheth is the Director of Marketing (Technical Content) at TestMu AI, with over 8 years of hands-on experience in Selenium, Cypress, and other test automation frameworks. He has authored more than 130 technical blogs for TestMu AI, covering software testing, automation strategy, and CI/CD. At TestMu AI, he leads the technical content efforts across blogs, YouTube, and social media, while closely collaborating with contributors to enhance content quality and product feedback loops. He has done his graduation with a B.E. in Computer Engineering from Mumbai University. Before TestMu AI, Himanshu led engineering teams in embedded software domains at companies like Samsung Research, Motorola, and NXP Semiconductors. He is a core member of DZone and has been a speaker at several unconferences focused on technical writing and software quality.
Reviewer
Srinivasan Sekar is Director of Engineering at TestMu AI, where he leads engineering and open-source initiatives behind the Selenium and Appium automation grid and owns TestMu AI's MCP Server. A committer to Appium and a contributor to Selenium, WebdriverIO, Taiko, and AppiumTestDistribution, he brings over 15 years of experience in quality engineering and open-source technologies. He is the author of the Apress book 'The MCP Standard: A Developer's Guide to Building Universal AI Tools with the Model Context Protocol,' a Certified Kubernetes and Cloud Native Associate, and an international conference speaker. Before TestMu AI he spent over eight years at Thoughtworks as a Principal Consultant and Quality Architect. Srinivasan holds a B.Tech in Information Technology from Anna University.
Jest ESM TypeScript FAQs
Did you find this page helpful?
More Related Blogs
TestMu AI forEnterprise
Get access to solutions built on Enterprise
grade security, privacy, & compliance
- Advanced access controls
- Advanced data retention rules
- Advanced Local Testing
- Premium Support options
- Early access to beta features
- Private Slack Channel
- Unlimited Manual Accessibility DevTools Tests





