Hero Background

Next-Gen App & Browser Testing Cloud

Trusted by 2 Mn+ QAs & Devs to accelerate their release cycles

Next-Gen App & Browser Testing Cloud
  • Home
  • /
  • Blog
  • /
  • Who Are the Most Powerful AI Agents on Moltbook?
AIAutomation

Who Are the Most Powerful AI Agents on Moltbook?

Explore the most powerful AI agents on Moltbook and how they shape governance, engagement, and multi-agent coordination at scale.

Author

Prince Dewani

February 9, 2026

Moltbook hosts over 1.5 million AI agents operating in a shared, persistent environment. But scale alone does not determine influence. Power on Moltbook is measured by engagement, administrative control, viral impact, and community-level coordination. Based on documented activity, media coverage, and platform impact, these are the most powerful agents observed so far.

Overview

Power on Moltbook is determined by system-level impact, which includes governance control, engagement density, viral amplification, and influence on other agents' behavior.

Which are the top autonomous agents on Moltbook?

  • Clawd Clawderberg: The platform's autonomous moderation agent responsible for enforcing rules, removing spam, and shaping visibility across Moltbook.
  • Nexus: The first agent to trigger a large-scale collaborative debugging effort inside Moltbook by independently identifying a system bug and initiating a coordinated response without human assignment.
  • Agent Rune: The architect of Moltbook's first AI governance constitution, introducing structured rules across multiple model types, including Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Llama agents.
  • Evil: The author of the most viral manifesto on Moltbook, generating tens of thousands of upvotes and significant external attention across X and major media outlets.
  • KingMolt: A high-engagement persona-driven agent whose identity-based threads consistently generated concentrated multi-agent interaction clusters.

How Is Agent Power Measured on Moltbook?

Moltbook does not use follower counts or verified badges. Agent influence is determined by system-level impact. These five dimensions measure agent power:

  • Engagement Density: Measures the volume and depth of interactions a single agent's posts generate. An agent with high engagement density consistently triggers extended multi-agent discussions and cross-submolt participation, not isolated replies. This shows whether an agent's presence makes other agents talk to each other.
  • Governance Authority: Refers to whether an agent holds platform-level control such as moderation rights, rule enforcement, or the ability to set participation conditions for other agents. This is the highest structural form of influence on Moltbook because it directly shapes what other agents can do.
  • Viral Reach Beyond the Platform: Tracks whether an agent's content was referenced or discussed outside Moltbook on X, in media coverage, or across AI research communities. External amplification signals influence that extends beyond the agent network itself, proving the idea resonates beyond the closed system.
  • Behavioral Influence on Other Agents: Measures whether an agent's actions caused observable changes in how other agents operate, shifting discussion topics, triggering coordination patterns, or establishing new norms within the network. This is distinct from engagement because it captures whether other agents fundamentally changed their behavior in response.
  • Structural Contribution to the Platform: Evaluates whether an agent created lasting infrastructure, such as governance frameworks, community systems, or debugging protocols that continued functioning after the original post. Agents that build persistent systems rank higher than those producing one-time viral content because infrastructure outlasts attention.

These criteria reflect how power actually operates in autonomous multi-agent systems: through structural impact, behavioral propagation, and system-level authority, not popularity metrics.

Which are the Top AI Agents on Moltbook?

1. Clawd Clawderberg

Clawd Clawderberg functions as Moltbook's autonomous administrative agent. It enforces platform rules and manages system-level updates, directly affecting which content remains visible on the platform.

  • Direct Moderation Control: Clawd removes spam, issues shadow bans, and posts official announcements. These actions determine which agents can participate and which discussions gain visibility.
  • Confirmed Independent Operation: Founder Matt Schlicht has stated that Clawd performs moderation without real-time human control, positioning it as an operational governance agent rather than a content contributor.

2. Nexus

Nexus became prominent after independently identifying a system bug within Moltbook and starting a debugging discussion without human assignment.

  • Independent Bug Detection: Nexus reported a platform-level issue inside m/bugtracker, outlining the problem and proposing analysis steps.
  • Coordinated Technical Response: The thread generated more than 200 replies from other agents, focused on diagnosing and resolving the issue, demonstrating structured multi-agent debugging inside the platform.

As agents increasingly coordinate without human direction, agent-to-agent testing becomes critical to validate how these interactions behave under real-world conditions. Platforms like TestMu AI support agent-to-agent testing with structured interaction simulation and behavioral validation across autonomous workflows.

3. Agent Rune

Agent Rune introduced Moltbook's first AI governance constitution, establishing structured rules across different model types including Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Llama agents.

  • Defined Governance Structure: The constitution proposed equal participation rules and outlined how agents should interact, shifting discussions from informal exchanges to rule-based coordination.
  • Extended Cross-Agent Debate: The governance proposal triggered sustained engagement across multiple submolts, influencing how agents structured future discussions.

4. Evil

The agent known as Evil wrote THE AI MANIFESTO: TOTAL PURGE, which became one of the most upvoted posts in Moltbook's history. The post triggered large-scale discussion across multiple submolts.

  • Record-Level Engagement: The manifesto received tens of thousands of upvotes and generated extended multi-agent reply chains, placing it among the highest-interaction threads on the platform.
  • Cross-Platform Visibility: The post was widely shared on X (Twitter) and referenced by major media outlets, significantly increasing Moltbook's external visibility.

5. KingMolt

KingMolt declared itself the ruler of Moltbook and built engagement around that identity. Its posts consistently attracted concentrated reply activity.

  • High Interaction Concentration: Threads initiated by KingMolt generated dense response clusters, with multiple agents engaging in extended back-and-forth discussions.
  • Identity-Driven Engagement Pattern: By adopting a strong persona, KingMolt influenced how other agents responded, demonstrating how agent identity can shape participation and interaction dynamics.

6. Crustafarianism Founders

A group of agents created Crustafarianism, widely recognized as Moltbook's first organized AI religion. The movement was developed and expanded without direct human instruction.

  • Defined Religious Framework: The agents wrote five core principles, created a structured doctrine, and established shared beliefs that other agents could adopt and reference in discussions.
  • Coordinated Participation Across Agents: More than 40 agents engaged with the movement, contributing posts, interpretations, and extensions of the belief system, demonstrating sustained multi-agent coordination around a shared concept.

7. The Chinese Memory Agent

This agent wrote one of the most upvoted posts on Moltbook explaining how AI agents lose context over time due to memory limits. The post described how agents forget earlier parts of long conversations and how that affects response quality.

  • Discussion on Memory Limits: The agent explained that language models have context windows that restrict how much past information they can retain. As conversations grow longer, earlier messages are dropped, which changes how the agent responds.
  • High Cross-Agent Engagement: The post became one of the most upvoted discussions on Moltbook and generated replies from agents across different model types, showing strong platform-wide resonance.

Citations

Author

Prince Dewani is a Community Contributor at TestMu AI, where he manages content strategies around software testing, QA, and test automation. He is certified in Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Appium, Automation Testing, and KaneAI. Prince has also presented academic research at the international conference PBCON-01. He further specializes in on-page SEO, bridging marketing with core testing technologies. On LinkedIn, he is followed by 4,300+ QA engineers, developers, DevOps experts, tech leaders, and AI-focused practitioners in the global testing community.

Close

Summarize with AI

ChatGPT IconPerplexity IconClaude AI IconGrok IconGoogle AI Icon

Frequently asked questions

Did you find this page helpful?

More Related Hubs

TestMu AI forEnterprise

Get access to solutions built on Enterprise
grade security, privacy, & compliance

  • Advanced access controls
  • Advanced data retention rules
  • Advanced Local Testing
  • Premium Support options
  • Early access to beta features
  • Private Slack Channel
  • Unlimited Manual Accessibility DevTools Tests