Coverage: Proven vs Owed
kane-cli cover measures coverage on two independent axes over the same store:
- Depth — what a real execution proved, read from an evidence pack's coverage records. Facts only: the pack was sealed with these verdicts inside it;
covernever recomputes them. - Completeness — what the design still owes, computed live from the
.context/graph. A perfect pack can still ship with an unverified criterion or a happy-path-only use-case; this axis never reads packs.
A run can look green and still owe you coverage — that's exactly the situation the two axes make visible.
kane-cli cover [--from <pack>] [--json] # the two-axis panel
kane-cli cover gaps [--stage design|cover|all] [--top <n>] [--from <pack>] # the ranked worklist
The panel
coverage — 8f0e…f2.evidence
depth (proven by the pack):
◐ ███░░░░░░░ 38% uc-buy-as-a-guest — partial (1/4 ACs proven, 1 failed, 1 blocked)
✔ ██████████ 100% uc-mobile-sign-in — covered (1/1 ACs proven) · 1 stale
completeness (live graph):
[high] create ac-payment-declined-message — no test verifies this AC
→ kane-cli design tests --use-case uc-buy-as-a-guest
The panel always shows both axes: the pack's proven depth, then the live-graph completeness worklist with its ready-to-paste commands (--json emits both as one document).
- The default pack is the newest in
<cwd>/.testmuai/evidence;--fromtakes a pack directory, a sealed.evidencefile, or an execution id. - Depth is risk-weighted and lenient: a high-risk criterion weighs more, and a passed-but-stale criterion still counts as proven — staleness is surfaced (
· N stale), never silently demoted. Per-use-case status iscovered(every AC proved) ·blocked(something couldn't run, nothing failed) ·partial·uncovered. - Coverage reflects this run: sealed packs cover only what the run touched. Project-wide coverage lives in the graph axis, unaffected by any single pack.
--jsonemits the full panel as structured data.
cover gaps — the worklist
One ranked list (risk first) of what to do next, each row with a ready-to-paste command:
gaps — stage design (5)
1. [high] create uc-checkout-while-signed-in — use-case has no scenarios
→ kane-cli design tests --use-case uc-checkout-while-signed-in
2. [med] create ac-the-cart-displays-an-order-subtotal — no live test verifies this acceptance criterion
→ kane-cli design tests --use-case uc-manage-the-cart
--stage design(default, no pack needed) — criteria no test verifies, use-cases with no or only-happy scenarios, recorded gap nodes from design runs, stale designed entities.--stage cover(needs a pack) — a covered criterion whose execution disappointed:failed→ re-design that slice;blockedor never-run → the test exists, run it.--stage all— both, one ranking.--top <n>trims the list.
cover gaps — the coverage ribbon (0.8.2)
The default output is one continuous band-table over two axes, entirely graph-fed — no pack is opened or needed:
- designed — how much of the live requirement set has a live test verifying it (risk-weighted: high-risk criteria weigh more). Freshness never moves the number — stale criteria surface as
STALEdebt instead. - proven — the store's own execution facts (every
testmd run/testrun runrecords its verdicts at finalize), scored by the same formula a sealed pack uses — so the live number and a pack's number agree at the formula level.--rollup lenient|strictselects the formula (defaultlenient). With no recorded runs anywhere, the proven line says so in words — never a fake 0%.
The ribbon is deliberately high-level. A three-line header — the title with the rollup and how recently anything ran, then both axis bars, the proven line carrying the class census — then one row per live use-case, ordered by severity (failing → blocked → design debt → stale → pending-run → clean): id, title, designed and proven percent bars colored by value, and per-class debt counts (FAILING · BLOCKED · STALE · TO DESIGN · TO RUN). A count column renders only when some use-case carries that debt, and a narrow terminal drops the counts and keeps id, title, and bars. The last line is the drill-in hint. There are no AC rows, commands, or gap rosters at this level — detail lives in the dossier. With zero execution facts the all-clear reads designed · nothing run yet; the ribbon only ever says "proven" when every criterion's verifying test actually passed. Piped output keeps the same grammar; color and the width-responsive layout differ.
(0.7.2) A change you deferred during a reconcile review still surfaces here — in the ribbon's debt counts, and as a pending row in the dossier and the --json document with the reconcile command as its remedy. Deferring parks a decision, it never hides one.
cover gaps <uc-id> — the dossier (0.8.2)
The dossier owns the detail for one use-case: its axis bars scoped to that use-case, then every live acceptance criterion in a full-text census table — id · STATE · RISK · criterion, wrapped, never truncated — proven and not-yet-run rows included. A failing row cites the test file when its id resolves to exactly one file (id-only otherwise), and a next actions block leads with evidence, never a blind re-run:
→ kane-cli evidence serve <pack> (see why it failed)
with the run/design remediation second, carrying its own warning — a failed test re-run in authoring mode may heal itself around the failure, so fix the app first.
Flags
--stage design|cover|all(defaultall) filters the--jsondocument's pending rows — it never moves a number, a row, or the table order.--top <n>bounds pending rows per use-case in the--jsondocument; the table always renders one row per use-case and is never truncated.--rollup lenient|strictselects the proven-axis formula (defaultlenient).--jsonemits the nested machine document: the designed axis, the proven axis (absent entirely when the store has no execution facts), and the per-use-case pending rows, each carrying itsready_command. With a<uc-id>the document closes over that use-case — one entry, project-wide leftovers emptied. Debt that belongs to no live use-case rides only the--jsondocument, never the human views.
Agents and CI (0.7.1)
Both cover and cover gaps take --mode agent|ci: the run speaks the same NDJSON envelope as the other assurance commands — the whole --json payload arrives as a single coverage (or gaps) event — with a <uc-id>, the closed-over document (0.8.2) — done is always last, and done's next[] carries the worklist's own ready-to-paste commands. A refusal is an error event plus done with exit 2. See Automation.
The join: how a pack knows your graph
Every per-test result in an evidence pack carries a definition_id — a hash of the resolved test definition, identical to the one design stamps on each test it emits. The pack↔graph join is this hash equality and nothing else: no ids to sync, no registry to maintain. A hand-edited test hashes differently and simply stops joining — honest, not broken (a redesign — design tests --force or maintain evolve — re-stamps the link).
Coverage records land in packs automatically whenever the project has a .context/ store — the inline run/testmd path and testrun both write them before sealing. A project without a store gets byte-identical packs to before; a coverage-write failure never costs the seal.
The authoring bridge
A freshly designed test has never been executed, and the tooling is honest about that:
kane-cli design testswritest-…_test.mdfiles — runnable, but with no recording yet.kane-cli testrunpreflight refuses never-authored members (missing_meta).- So the first run of each designed test is
kane-cli testmd run <file>— the agent authors it in a real browser and commits the recording. - From then on the test replays like any other: batch it with
testrun, and its verdicts join the pack viadefinition_id.
Until step 3 happens, cover reads the test's criteria as covered on paper, unproven in execution (covered_by present, execution not-run). That is a deliberate reading, not a bug — a designed test is a claim until a run proves it.
Inside the pack: coverage/usecases.yaml
The pack's coverage record is one YAML file you can read, diff, and archive — one row per live use-case: identity and risk, sources and provenance, scenarios, and each acceptance criterion with its verdict join (covered_by, execution: passed|failed|blocked|not-run, fresh, the expected answer, and what satisfied it). Diff two packs' usecases.yaml to see exactly what a release changed in proven coverage.
Next steps
- The authoring bridge in practice — design → author → batch.
- Maintaining the suite — act on what the gaps list tells you.
